For once, I disagree with Seth.
At a recent seminar, a woman who helps run a community college stood up to ask a question.
“Well, the bad news,” she said, “is that we have to let everyone in. And the truth is, many of these kids just can’t be the leaders you’re describing, can’t make art. We need people to do manual work, and it’s those people.”
I couldn’t believe it. I was speechless, then heartbroken.
So, there are people who are not leaders. People who are not remarkably creative or artistic. People who don’t aspire to rise to the top of any particular pile. People who are content with a simple life, with work that may or may not stimulate them, with the love they’re able to give and receive.
Admittedly, I’m not one of “those people.” I’m naturally restless. I always have bright ideas for tomorrow / next month / next year. I struggle to find contentment in having my basic needs met. Vocational boredom is almost intolerable to me.
But if everyone were like me, nothing would get done.
This makes me thankful for people who are more easily satisfied than me. Who aren’t so often distracted by endless ideas and inspiration. Who prefer the consistency of repetitive or mundane work to the neurosis of creating, managing, financing, solving, consoling and everything else that comes with being a leader.
I don’t think less of “those people.” I respect them. Heck, I envy them! Their lives are usually so much more balanced than mine.
Why so heartbroken, Seth?
When those that we’ve chosen to teach and lead write off people because of what they look like or where they live or who their parents are, it’s a tragedy. Worse, we often write people off merely because they’ve been brainwashed into thinking that they have no ability to do more than they’ve been assigned. Well, if we brainwashed them into setting limits, I know we can teach them to ignore those limits.
I agree about stereotyping, and I agree about brainwashing, but I don’t think the woman he quoted was guilty of either.
Wasn’t she just being honest? Pragmatic?
We can’t all be leaders, and there’s nothing to be gained by trying to mould the unwilling into something we imagine they could be capable of.
If we’re not careful, we’ll become so desperate to foist our version of greatness – e.g. risk-taking / game-changing / cutting-edge – on people destined for something entirely different.
I’m not interested in trying to tear “those people” away from their straightforward / stress-free / simple lives. I’m certainly not interested in demeaning their choice to live that way, assuming it really was a choice.
I’m grateful for the work “those people” do, and more often than not, I want to learn from their ability to do it so cheerfully.
Luke, I wonder if this post is creating a false antithesis between leader/follower, teacher/pupil, restless achiever/content producer/manual labourer? Some people are undoubtedly more ambitious, restless and committed to constant striving than others, but a degree of unsatisfied longing/desire is an element of the all complicit in the state of fallen humanity prior to the eschaton, isn’t it?
You’re right; those who are less ambitious/restless still strive, in some way, for something. What I was trying to rebut (feebly, I’m sure) was the notion that another person’s striving should look like the sort of striving I understand / respect before I’ll accept it as worthwhile. To onlookers, a person may appear uncreative or to completely lack initiative… that doesn’t make them less valuable or diminish the contributions they make in more subtle ways than their more visionary counterparts. Trying to extract initiative that meets my expectations from people who simply don’t have it? That seems foolish, and wrong.
Well, I agree with that! ;)
As Jürgen Moltmann observes, Marx got it quite wrong
in his description of religious hope as an ‘opiate’: ‘Faith’, he writes, ‘wherever it develops into hope, causes not rest but unrest, not patience but impatience. It does not calm the unquiet heart, but is itself this unquiet heart in man. Those
who hope in Christ can no longer put up with reality as it is, but begin to suffer under it, to contradict it. Peace with God means conflict with the world, for the goad of the promised future stabs inexorably into the flesh of every unfulfilled
present’. Thus Christian hope is a disposition through which the believer (and through transformed lives and renewed communities, the world) is, by the Spirit, drawn gradually towards and conformed to the pattern of that promised future of God which is hoped for. Faith’s present, that is to say, is shaped, orientated and energized by the ways in which, under the guidance of Word and spirit together, faith imaginatively apprehends and patterns this future promise, and seeks to live
already in the light of it.
good points luke. agreed. providing it really was a choice. and in many cases – it is.
I think I’m one of those people… in the words of Ella Fitzgerald: “give me the simple life” :)
yeh i can do without stress and responsibility too, to a certain extent. a job doesnt have to be top-level to hold my interest. that being said, i strongly dislike most factory work.
Simplicity and desire don’t need to be antithetical. I should add that the last post was a quote!
My comment was responding to the blog post, not your quote (a great one at that!) Ali :)